In a recent contraband sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), federal agents confiscated 19 pages of notes from Sean Combs’ belongings, sparking a legal battle. These notes, which included inspirational quotes, reminders about family and financial issues, and a “To-Do List,” have turned into a focal point of contention between federal prosecutors and Combs’ defense team.
The “To-Do List” contained instructions for a family member to “find dirt” on two potential victims and to “find everything” on another, which federal prosecutors promptly turned over for review. Combs’ attorney, Marc Agnifilo, criticized the prosecution for holding onto the notes for weeks before informing the defense, accusing them of a “complete institutional failure” and alleging a violation of Combs’ constitutional rights due to the inclusion of privileged materials.
The prosecution responded by stating that the notes were vetted by a “filter team” which ensured no privileged information was included before they reached prosecutors’ hands. Federal agent Mary Slavik defended the actions of her team, asserting they handled the documents appropriately.
The case escalated to an emergency hearing presided over by Judge Subramanian, who ruled the notes inadmissible as evidence and ordered all copies destroyed. During the hearing, Combs, who appeared unshackled—a privilege that will continue in future court appearances—displayed a relaxed demeanor, engaging warmly with his attorneys and observing the courtroom proceedings.
This incident has stirred discussions on legal procedures and the rights of individuals in custody, highlighting the complex balance between law enforcement duties and individual rights.
