A federal judge has temporarily stopped former President Donald Trump’s executive order that banned transgender people from serving in the military.
The ruling came after six active-duty transgender service members and two others who wanted to join the military challenged Trump’s order in court. They argued that the ban violates their rights under the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection.
Judge Ana Reyes, from Washington, D.C., ruled that Trump’s order likely goes against the Constitution. However, she delayed enforcing her decision until Friday, giving the government time to appeal.
“The court understands this decision may spark debates and appeals, but that is a sign of a healthy democracy,” Reyes stated. “Regardless of opinions, we should all agree that those who serve deserve respect and gratitude.”
Who Challenged the Ban?
The lawsuit was filed by a group of transgender service members, including:
- A platoon leader in the Army Reserves from Pennsylvania
- An Army major who received a Bronze Star for service in Afghanistan
- A Navy sailor who won a “Sailor of the Year” award
Their attorneys, from the National Center for Lesbian Rights and GLAD Law, said these service members simply want to continue protecting their country like any other soldier.
What Did Trump’s Order Say?
Trump signed the executive order on January 27, claiming that transgender identity conflicts with military values like discipline and honesty. He also argued that allowing transgender people to serve could harm military readiness.
Thousands of transgender people currently serve in the U.S. military, though they make up less than 1% of all active-duty troops.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth supported a policy that would prevent most people with gender dysphoria from enlisting.
Past and Present Policies
This isn’t the first time transgender military service has been debated.
- During Trump’s first term, he ordered a ban on transgender troops.
- When President Joe Biden took office, he reversed Trump’s ban and allowed transgender people to serve again.
Now, with Judge Reyes’ ruling, the issue is back in the spotlight. The final decision will depend on future court appeals and potential policy changes from the government.
